Dear ETs,
From the moment we are born till our death, we seem to be transported on wheels.
The comic strip below is a humourous look at the various forms of transport that we get ourselves into at different ages of our life.
Some ideas I had was a discussion on various modes of transport, life and death, stages of a person's life and why do people choose different transportation at different stages of life.
Students can contruct sentences with structures such as "When I was _____ years old, I rode/drove (on) a _________ ." or "When I am _____ (age), I will ride/drive _____________ (transport)."
As a writing exercise, students can describe the various stages of life and what they are able to do.
This picture series can be cut up and students rearrange the pictures in the correct order. It will be a great warmer or enrichment activity.
What are some other ideas that we could do from this comic strip?
Comments and suggestions are welcomed.
Rodney Tan Chai Whatt
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------
An English Language teaching and learning blog that contributes and discusses ELT and educational issues. Blogged by a progressive English Teacher (ET) from the UNESCO Historic City of Melaka in Malaysia--its aim is to inform and inspire other ETs to be great ETs!
Showing posts with label humour. Show all posts
Showing posts with label humour. Show all posts
Thursday, June 7, 2012
Friday, February 17, 2012
Tuesday, January 24, 2012
Happy Chinese Lunar New Year of the Dragon 2012
Dear All,
Here's another collection of pictures which was downloaded from my Facebook and from friends' referrals.
Enjoy!
Rodney Tan
------------------------------------------------
Here's another collection of pictures which was downloaded from my Facebook and from friends' referrals.
Enjoy!
Rodney Tan
------------------------------------------------
My children received this unique moveable action angpow (red packet with money). It's a Doraemon themed angpow where the two pictures will move when pulled. The circular Doraemon will turn clockwise while the smaller figure will move towards the right. The money will be in the envelope when you have pulled the right handle out. Cool!
This angpow was distributed by a Member of Parliament to promote her party and her constituency.
Chinese Character : loong meaning dragon
Chinese Lion Dance
Traditional Chinese New Year Meal
Old Style Hutong Chinese New Year Celebration
CNY Lanterns
Chinese Opera
Traditional Chinese Music - pipa
Traditional Lion Dance
Traditional Yee Sang dish (Cantonese)
CNY Lights at the Kek Lok Si Temple in Penang
CNY Lights in Penang
Humour: Lexophile
Dear All,
Enjoy this play with words!
Rodney Tan
P.S. Can you create or think of any other sentences.
---------------------------------------------------
Enjoy this play with words!
Rodney Tan
P.S. Can you create or think of any other sentences.
---------------------------------------------------
Lexophiles
1.
A bicycle can't stand alone; it is two tired.
2.
A will is a dead giveaway.
3.
Time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana.
4.
A backward poet writes inverse.
5.
A chicken crossing the road:
poultry in motion.
6.
When a clock is hungry it goes back four seconds.
7.
The guy who fell onto an upholstery machine was fully recovered.
8.
You are stuck with your debt if you can't budge it.
9.
He broke into song because he couldn't find the key.
10. A calendar's days are numbered.
11. A boiled egg is hard to beat.
12. He had a photographic memory which
was never developed.
13. The short fortune teller who
escaped from prison: a small medium at large.
14. Those who get too big for their
britches will be exposed in the end.
15. When you've seen one shopping
center you've seen a mall.
16. If you jump off a Paris bridge, you
are in Seine.
17. When she saw her first strands of gray
hair, she thought she'd dye.
18. Santa's helpers are subordinate
clauses.
19. Acupuncture: a jab well done.
20. Marathon runners with bad shoes
suffer the agony of de feet.
21. The roundest knight at king
Arthur's round table was Sir Cumference. He acquired his
size from too much pi.
22. I thought I saw an eye doctor on an
Alaskan island, but it turned out to be an optical
Aleutian.
23. She was only a whiskey maker, but
he loved her still.
24. A rubber band pistol was
confiscated from algebra class because it was a weapon of
math disruption.
25. No matter how much you push the
envelope, it'll still be stationery.
26. A dog gave birth to puppies near
the road and was cited for littering.
27 Two silk worms had a race. They
ended up in a tie.
28. A hole has been found in the nudist
camp wall. The police are looking into it.
29. Atheism is a non-prophet
organization.
30. I wondered why the baseball kept
getting bigger. Then it hit me.
31. A sign on the lawn at a drug rehab
center said: 'Keep off the Grass.'
32. A small boy swallowed some coins
and went to the hospital. When his
mother
telephoned to ask how he was, a
nurse said, 'No change yet.'
33. The soldier who survived mustard
gas and pepper spray is now a seasoned veteran.
34. Don't join dangerous cults:
practice safe sects.
Monday, January 16, 2012
Views: Why Are SMart People Usually Ugly?
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Why Are Smart People Usually Ugly?
An answer to the Explainer's 2011 Question of the Year.
Jean-Paul Sartre and Socrates were known for their
brains and not their looks—at least not the good kind.
Illlustration by
Charlie Powell.
It's been a few
weeks since we posted the questions that the Explainer was either unwilling
or unable to answer in 2011. Among this year's batch of imponderables were
inquiries like, Are the blind sleepy all the time? and Does anyone ever get a
sex change back? We asked our readers to pick the question that most deserved
an answer in the Explainer column. Some 10,000 of you were able to register a
vote, and the winning question is presented below. But first, the runners-up:
In third place,
with 6.6 percent of the total votes, a bit of speculative evolutionary
biology: Let's say that a meteor never hits the earth, and dinosaurs continue
evolving over all the years human beings have grown into what we are today.
What would they be like?
In second place,
with 7.5 percent, an inquiry into pharmacokinetics: Why does it take 45
minutes for the pharmacy to get your prescription ready—even when no one else
is waiting?
And in first
place, with the support of 9.4 percent of our readers, the winner by a
landslide and Explainer Question of the Year for 2011:
Why are smart
people usually ugly? I get this isn't always the case, but there does seem to
be a correlation. Attractiveness doesn't predict intelligence (not all ugly
people are smart), but it seems like intelligence can be a good predictor for
attractiveness (smart people are usually on the ugly side). Keep in mind, I
have nothing against people who are really brilliant, I've just always wondered.
The answer:
They’re not.
Oh, how the
Explainer loves a false premise. When it comes time to assemble the year-end
list, he'll always give extra credit to questions that are predicated on
blatant untruths. In 2010, for example, someone wanted to know why athletes
never sneeze. In 2009, a reader asked, Why is it always funny to put
something on your head as a pretend hat? But this year's winning question
isn't merely ill-posed; it gets the truth exactly backward.
The idea that an
ugly face might hide a subtle mind has attracted scientific inquiries for
many years. At first, scientists wanted to know whether it was possible to
read someone's intelligence from the shape of his face. In 1918, a researcher
in Ohio showed a dozen photographic portraits of well-dressed children to a
group of physicians and teachers, and asked the adults to rank the kids from
smartest to dumbest. A couple of years later, a Pittsburgh psychologist ran a
similar experiment using headshots of 69 employees from a department store. In
both studies, seemingly naive guesses were compared to actual test scores to
see if they were ever accurate.*
Many such
studies followed, and with consistent results: You can learn something about
how smart someone is just by looking at a picture. But scientists couldn't
figure out where that information might have been hiding in the photographs.
The Ohio researcher said that some of his subjects were "greatly
influenced by the pleasant appearance or smile, but for some the smile
denotes intelligence and for others it denotes feeble-mindedness." The
author of the follow-up in Pittsburgh wondered if the secret of intelligence
might not be lurking in "the lustre of the eye."
While some
researchers pondered this question, a Columbia University psychologist named
Edward Thorndike made another, related discovery. In 1920, Thorndike
published his theory of the "halo effect," according to which
subjects, when asked to describe someone's various qualities, tend to
"[suffuse] ratings of special features with a halo belonging to the
individual as a whole." If they were describing the person's physique,
for example, along with his bearing, intelligence, and tact, they would
assign high or low ratings across the board. Later studies confirmed that the
halo effect could arise from a simple photograph: If someone looks handsome,
people tend to assume that he's smarter, more sociable, and better-adjusted,
too.
Now there were
two findings: First, scientists knew that it was possible to gauge someone's
intelligence just by sizing him up; second, they knew that people tend to
assume that beauty and brains go together. So they asked the next question:
Could it be that good-looking people really are more intelligent?
Here the data
were less clear, but several reviews of the literature have concluded that
there is indeed a small, positive relationship between beauty and brains.
Most recently, the evolutionary psychologist Satoshi Kanazawa pulled huge
datasets from two sources—the National Child Development Study in the United
Kingdom (including 17,000 people born in 1958), and the National Longitudinal
Study of Adolescent Health in the United States (including 21,000 people born
around 1980)—both of which included ratings of physical attractiveness and
scores on standard intelligence tests. When Kanazawa analyzed the numbers, he
found the two were related: In the U.K., for example, attractive children
have an additional 12.4 points of IQ, on average. The relationship held even
when he controlled for family background, race, and body size.
From this,
Kanazawa concluded that the famous halo effect is not a cognitive illusion,
as so many academics had assumed, but rather an accurate reading of the
world: We assume that beautiful people are smart, he argues, because they
are.
The story does
have some caveats and complications. First, a few other studies have come up
with different results. A recent look at yearbook photos from a Wisconsin
high school in 1957 found no link between IQ and attractiveness among the
boys, but a positive correlation for the girls. Another researcher, Leslie
Zebrowitz of Brandeis University, noticed that the looks-smarts relationship
applies only to the ugly side of the spectrum. It's not that beautiful people
are especially smart, she says, so much as that ugly people are especially
dumb. Then there's the fact of Kanazawa's having gotten into trouble last
spring for asserting—using the same dataset and similar methods to those
described above—that African-American women are objectively "far less
attractive" than whites, Asians, or Native Americans. (He later
acknowledged some flaws in his analysis.)
So, getting back
to the original question, the bulk of the evidence suggests that smart people
are not "usually ugly." In fact, the opposite seems to be true:
Either smart people are more beautiful than average, or dumb people are more
ugly (or both). And while no facial features within the normal range could
ever be that useful as a predictor of intelligence, people can perform better
than you’d expect from random chance using nothing more than a head shot.
All of which
leaves one great, unanswered question. If smart people tend to be
good-looking, that might explain the halo effect. But what led our questioner
to get things backward and assume that smart people were ugly? And why are
there so many like-minded others, asking the same question—or its
inverse—around the Internet? (Here's one, and one more.) Aren't we all
familiar with the archetypical nerd, who is both ugly and smart? At the
opposite end, what about all those beautiful, airheaded women and beefy,
brainless men we see on television? Could the person who wrote in with the
2011 Question of the Year be succumbing to a bias that hasn't yet been
documented in the lab—a sort of halo effect in reverse, a "horns effect,"
perhaps?
Ugly geniuses
aren't uncommon in history, of course, and while these anecdotes tell us
nothing about the population as a whole, the memory of people who were
famously hideous and brilliant might have an outsize influence on our
judgments. Jean-Paul Sartre, for example, was short, bespectacled, and
wall-eyed. ("I cannot even decide whether [my face] is handsome or
ugly," says one of his characters in Nausea. "I think it is ugly because
I have been told so.") Ancient sources tell us that the great
philosopher Socrates had thinning hair, flared nostrils, widely-spaced eyes,
a thick neck, slobby shoulders, and a pot belly. Ludwig van Beethoven was
ugly and smelled bad; Abraham Lincoln's face struck the poet Walt Whitman as
being "so awful ugly it becomes beautiful."
In addition,
Kanazawa points out that a closer look at the data reveals an interesting
fact: The very ugliest people in his dataset are dumber on average, but they
also tend to be the most diverse when it comes to intelligence. That means
that if you're at the low end of the spectrum for looks, you're more likely
than anyone else to be at one extreme end for IQ (either very dumb or very
smart). If that's the case, then it might provide another reason why Sartre
and Socrates types stick out in our minds. We know (consciously or not) that
ugly people tend to be a little dim; but at the same time, there are more
brilliant brutes running around than we might expect.
For his part,
Kanazawa rejects the notion of the horns effect—he doesn't believe the
smart-and-ugly stereotype exists at all. (Indeed, it has never been shown in
the lab.) Instead, he says, we may be assuming that smart people are nerdy,
and that nerdy people tend to lack social skills. Since people with social
skills are attractive, there could be an indirect link between at least one
kind of "attractiveness" and intelligence. But if you're looking at
pure "beauty," as measured by rating photographs or measured facial
features, then intelligence and looks go hand-in-hand.
Bonus Explainer:
Why might intelligence and looks go hand-in-hand? There are a few different
theories. First, it might be that some common genetic factor produces both
smarts and beauty. Or maybe there's a combination of genes that make people
both dumb and ugly. Kanazawa thinks it's the former, arguing that intelligent
men have tended to rise to the top of the social hierarchy and select
beautiful women as their mates. Their offspring, contra George Bernard Shaw's
supposed quip, would have had both traits together.
Another theory
holds that certain environmental factors in the womb or just after birth can
produce both facial disfigurements and cognitive impairments on one side, or
facial symmetry and high intelligence on the other. A third suggests that
attractive children are treated better, and receive more attention from their
caretakers and teachers, which helps to nurture a sharper mind. It's also
possible that smart people are better able to take care of themselves and
their looks.
Explainer thanks
Satoshi Kanazawa of the London School of Economics, Joshua Knobe of Yale
University, Alina Simone, author of You Must Go and Win, and Leslie Zebrowitz
of Brandeis University.
* * *
Good news: After
years of hiding out in the Explainatorium like a banished superhero,
answering submitted questions from deep inside the fortress, the Explainer
has decided to soar out into the world, pen in hand, to spread peace and
understanding among the column's faithful.
And so we
present a new, occasional feature on Slate: the Explainer House Call. Do you
have a family disagreement over some fact or pseudo-fact? Are you stuck in an
endless argument with an annoying co-worker or a friend? Have your attempts
to Google your way out of it only pushed you both into the filter bubbles of
the Internet? Worry no more: The Explainer will be your arbiter and your
savior, an avenging angel of argument, slinging thunderbolts of pure reason
and drenching your squabbles in the heavy rain of explanation.
How does one
qualify for this personal Explainer service? To get a house call, and have
the Explainer resolve your special beef in Slate, you must first gain the
support of your peers. What factual matter has been driving you and your friend/spouse/coworker
bonkers in recent weeks? Post a short summary on or with the hashtag
#ExplainerHouseCall. Then we'll ask the members of Explainer Nation to vote
for the dispute that's most deserving of the Explainer's attention. (Winners: Please note that the
Explainer will not actually visit your house.)
Correction, Jan. 12, 2012: The original overstated the magnitude of the results of the Ohio and Pittsburgh studies. |
Tuesday, October 4, 2011
Vocabulary: Understanding Business Jargon
Dear Readers,
Below this note is an article from the Daily Mail, UK which would be useful for those who teach business English and for others who are curious to know the latest business jargon, idioms, catch phrase, acronymns and initialisms used in the office context.
For general readers, reading this article will help us gain useful knowledge and make us smile as some of the explanations about the jargons are really funny and bizarre.
The main source of these office phrases is from a recently published book: Pushing The Envelope: Making Sense Out Of Business Jargon by Caroline Taggart (Michael O’Mara Books, £9.99).
Enjoy!
Rodney Tan
----------------------------------------
Gobbledegook: David Brent could use many of
the phrases outlined in a new book on office jargon
A chat about last night's television coined
the phrase water-cooler moment
The metaphor of swarm intelligence comes from
the notion of hives of bees or colonies of ants working together to a common
end. So team work
Below this note is an article from the Daily Mail, UK which would be useful for those who teach business English and for others who are curious to know the latest business jargon, idioms, catch phrase, acronymns and initialisms used in the office context.
For general readers, reading this article will help us gain useful knowledge and make us smile as some of the explanations about the jargons are really funny and bizarre.
The main source of these office phrases is from a recently published book: Pushing The Envelope: Making Sense Out Of Business Jargon by Caroline Taggart (Michael O’Mara Books, £9.99).
Enjoy!
Rodney Tan
----------------------------------------
OK you cubicle
monkeys, guess who's gonna be delayered in the blamestorm! Baffled by bizarre
office jargon? Let us translate for you
Sick
of bosses and work colleagues spouting incomprehensible metaphors, acronyms and
made-up words? If so, fear not - this handy guide to office speak explains
all...
SITTING
DOWN
When a perfectly sensible phrase already exists, why invent a daft one to replace it? ‘Shall we sit down on this?’ translates as ‘Shall we have a meeting?’
When a perfectly sensible phrase already exists, why invent a daft one to replace it? ‘Shall we sit down on this?’ translates as ‘Shall we have a meeting?’
CUBICLE
MONKEY
A derogatory expression for someone performing a never-ending stream of dull and repetitive tasks in the confines of a 5ft-x-5ft fibreboard cell.
A derogatory expression for someone performing a never-ending stream of dull and repetitive tasks in the confines of a 5ft-x-5ft fibreboard cell.
MARZIPAN
LAYER
Stickier version of the glass ceiling. Barrier between middle-management and the boardroom above which few women rise.
Stickier version of the glass ceiling. Barrier between middle-management and the boardroom above which few women rise.
BRAIN
DUMP
You’re leaving your job — and the 30,000 emails, 400 Word documents and 150 Powerpoint presentations you accrued while there. You want to make this information available to your successor but don’t want the bother of sorting through the rubbish.
You’re leaving your job — and the 30,000 emails, 400 Word documents and 150 Powerpoint presentations you accrued while there. You want to make this information available to your successor but don’t want the bother of sorting through the rubbish.
The
solution? Save it all on to the computer system and ‘dump’ it on the poor chap
who inherits your computer. Frankly, you’re beyond caring.
MANAGING
EXPECTATIONS
Also known as brazen deception — like telling your shareholders to expect the worst, then dazzling them with better-than-expected profits. The great proponent of this is the Disneyland theme park, which hangs a sign saying ‘Waiting time for ride from here 45 minutes’ at the point in the queue when the waiting time is, in fact, 30 minutes.
Also known as brazen deception — like telling your shareholders to expect the worst, then dazzling them with better-than-expected profits. The great proponent of this is the Disneyland theme park, which hangs a sign saying ‘Waiting time for ride from here 45 minutes’ at the point in the queue when the waiting time is, in fact, 30 minutes.
Punters
are then delighted to reach the front of the queue 15 minutes earlier than
expected.
WATER-COOLER
MOMENT
This phrase first came into use in the 1990s to describe a controversial moment in a soap opera that had everyone talking around the watercooler/fax machine the following morning.
This phrase first came into use in the 1990s to describe a controversial moment in a soap opera that had everyone talking around the watercooler/fax machine the following morning.
Example:
‘Did you see Nancy on Strictly last night? Talk about hoisted by her own
feather boa.’
BLUE-SKY
THINKING
In the 1960s and 70s, blue-sky thinking was something to be avoided. It meant an unrealistic, unaffordable pipe dream. But the phrase has had a make-over and is now something to aspire to, meaning: ‘The sky’s the limit — so reach for the stars!’
In the 1960s and 70s, blue-sky thinking was something to be avoided. It meant an unrealistic, unaffordable pipe dream. But the phrase has had a make-over and is now something to aspire to, meaning: ‘The sky’s the limit — so reach for the stars!’
THOUGHT
SHOWER
Invented by the PC brigade in 2004, after civil servants deemed brainstorm offensive to people with brain disorders such as epilepsy. The National Society For Epilepsy then carried out a survey that reported ‘93 per cent of people with epilepsy did not find the term derogatory or offensive in any way’. A small victory for common sense.
Invented by the PC brigade in 2004, after civil servants deemed brainstorm offensive to people with brain disorders such as epilepsy. The National Society For Epilepsy then carried out a survey that reported ‘93 per cent of people with epilepsy did not find the term derogatory or offensive in any way’. A small victory for common sense.
PUSHING
THE ENVELOPE
In aeronautical parlance, the ‘flight envelope’ describes a plane’s best possible performance — flying at the fastest speed, the highest altitude, using full engine capacity. Engineers and test pilots who ‘pushed the envelope’ were trying to create a plane that could fly faster, higher and farther than ever before.
In aeronautical parlance, the ‘flight envelope’ describes a plane’s best possible performance — flying at the fastest speed, the highest altitude, using full engine capacity. Engineers and test pilots who ‘pushed the envelope’ were trying to create a plane that could fly faster, higher and farther than ever before.
Now
it refers to any moderately ambitious office project, leading to the joke: ‘No
matter how much you push the envelope, it will still be stationary.’
JOINED-UP
A phrase much-loved by New Labour, which touted its ‘joined-up government’ of supposedly integrated social policies. It has since spilled over into office life, with firms bragging about their ‘joined-up thinking’. Which is invariably nothing of the sort.
A phrase much-loved by New Labour, which touted its ‘joined-up government’ of supposedly integrated social policies. It has since spilled over into office life, with firms bragging about their ‘joined-up thinking’. Which is invariably nothing of the sort.
SWARM
INTELLIGENCE
CORE
COMPETENCIES
Otherwise known as: ‘What you’re good at.’
Otherwise known as: ‘What you’re good at.’
BLAMESTORMING
A corruption of ‘brainstorming’, blamestorming is a meeting or discussion held to establish who is at fault when something has gone wrong.
A corruption of ‘brainstorming’, blamestorming is a meeting or discussion held to establish who is at fault when something has gone wrong.
Everyone
concerned gathers to excuse themselves and pass the blame on to the nearest
scapegoat — like on The Apprentice.
MUSHROOM
MANAGEMENT
An aggressive style of management. Jonathan Green, who compiled a Dictionary of Jargon in 1987, defines it as a theory of management that believes the best way of treating employees is to ‘put them in the dark, feed them muck and watch them grow’. Time off and pension packages do not feature heavily.
An aggressive style of management. Jonathan Green, who compiled a Dictionary of Jargon in 1987, defines it as a theory of management that believes the best way of treating employees is to ‘put them in the dark, feed them muck and watch them grow’. Time off and pension packages do not feature heavily.
SALAMI
TACTICS
Refers to a type of computer fraud which transfers small — salami-thin — amounts of money, never enough to be noticeable, from one account to another.
Refers to a type of computer fraud which transfers small — salami-thin — amounts of money, never enough to be noticeable, from one account to another.
MASS
SAMPLING
If you’ve ever accepted a free cube of cheese in a supermarket or been accosted by a perfume spritzer in a department store, then you’ve been a victim of mass sampling. A marketing ploy intended to make customers try — then buy — a new product. Also known as a freebie.
If you’ve ever accepted a free cube of cheese in a supermarket or been accosted by a perfume spritzer in a department store, then you’ve been a victim of mass sampling. A marketing ploy intended to make customers try — then buy — a new product. Also known as a freebie.
SWOT
ANALYSIS
A U.S. management term from the Sixties, SWOT stands for ‘strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats’.
A U.S. management term from the Sixties, SWOT stands for ‘strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats’.
Discussion: Employees get together in a SWOT
analysis to talk about the business and its competitors - which the boss then
often ignores
Employees
get together to consider the business, its competitors and the state of the
market. Then the boss ignores them.
FUD
An acronym for fear, uncertainty and doubt — a set of negative emotions planted in the minds of the public by those involved in politics and marketing. The aim of a FUD strategy is to scare voters or customers away from voting for an unproven party, or buying a rival new product.
An acronym for fear, uncertainty and doubt — a set of negative emotions planted in the minds of the public by those involved in politics and marketing. The aim of a FUD strategy is to scare voters or customers away from voting for an unproven party, or buying a rival new product.
ZERO-SUM
GAME
An outcome in which one side’s gain precisely matches another side’s loss. The phrase originated in a branch of mathematics known as Game Theory. It’s what happens when that greedy swine from accounts snaffles the last slice of cake just before you in the canteen.
An outcome in which one side’s gain precisely matches another side’s loss. The phrase originated in a branch of mathematics known as Game Theory. It’s what happens when that greedy swine from accounts snaffles the last slice of cake just before you in the canteen.
DELAYERING
A way of making an organisation less bureaucratic. Also a euphemism for ‘redundancies’.
A way of making an organisation less bureaucratic. Also a euphemism for ‘redundancies’.
(OUT
OF) LEFT FIELD
An American baseball term that has crossed the Atlantic. A ball bowled out of left field is one the batsman isn’t expecting. A left-field idea comes out of nowhere, doesn’t follow logically from anything that has been discussed before — and may well be complete rubbish.
An American baseball term that has crossed the Atlantic. A ball bowled out of left field is one the batsman isn’t expecting. A left-field idea comes out of nowhere, doesn’t follow logically from anything that has been discussed before — and may well be complete rubbish.
WOMBAT
‘Waste of money, brains and time.’ Swiftly followed by the sack.
‘Waste of money, brains and time.’ Swiftly followed by the sack.
DEAD
CAT BOUNCE
An expression born in the trading rooms of Singapore and Malaysia and adopted by Wall Street in the mid-1980s. Working on the assumption that ‘even a dead cat would bounce if it was dropped from a great height’, the phrase is used to describe a brief upturn in the value of a stock after it’s hit rock bottom.
An expression born in the trading rooms of Singapore and Malaysia and adopted by Wall Street in the mid-1980s. Working on the assumption that ‘even a dead cat would bounce if it was dropped from a great height’, the phrase is used to describe a brief upturn in the value of a stock after it’s hit rock bottom.
UPSTREAM/
DOWNSTREAM
Traditionally used by anglers and canoeists, the terms refer to various stages in the manufacturing process. Upstream refers to the manufacturer, downstream to the retailer. And somewhere at the furthest end of the stream, basking in the shallows, is the customer.
Traditionally used by anglers and canoeists, the terms refer to various stages in the manufacturing process. Upstream refers to the manufacturer, downstream to the retailer. And somewhere at the furthest end of the stream, basking in the shallows, is the customer.
- Pushing The Envelope: Making Sense
Out Of Business Jargon by Caroline Taggart (Michael O’Mara Books, £9.99).
Comments (10)
Some
of my (least) favourite: "Moving forwards" (doing it), "being
proactive" (having another meeting), "dynamic" (anything but),
and "forward thinking" (realising the project you are half way through
completing probably needs a reason for existing)
-
James, Luton, 04/10/2011 11:50
My
current hate phrase - "over arching"....GAH!
-
norfolksheep, Norfolk UK, 04/10/2011 11:08
"Top
slicing" is another currently fashionable piece of stupid jargon. I have
long been wary of people that use jargon, concluding that they usually have no
idea what they are talking about. Sadly local authorities are very susceptable
to using meaningless jargon. It's often in their staff job descriptions!
-
Peter Phillips, Surrey, 04/10/2011 10:45
My
very large company has loads. 'moving forward' means we are going to do what
the manager says even if it is daft and if you keep argueing against it you are
holding up progress. 'meet the future demands of the megatrends' means we have
no idea what the future of the business will be. 'Synergies' we have shoved
together two functions that don't work together, did it anyway. 'our vision' -
your vision, I will have my own visions thank you very much. blah blah..
-
The Monitor, Revelation, 04/10/2011 10:20
Guy
at my work says "I've no spare bandwidth" meaning he's busy!!! Don't
know how I keep a straght face.
-
Mboza Ritchie, Just up the road, 04/10/2011 10:05
As
far as I can remember, Ricky Gervais never used phrases like these in The
Office. - Mike, Thailand, 04/10/2011 04:57 Ricky Gervais did use management
speak in The Office. In series 2, he kept Neil up to date with a management
style called 'Team Individuality'
-
The bitter truth is hard to swallow, Birmingham, UK, 04/10/2011 09:31
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)