Showing posts with label fun. Show all posts
Showing posts with label fun. Show all posts

Saturday, June 9, 2012

Poem: Time Tested Beauty Tips by Sam Levenson

Dear  All,

This is a wonderful poem written by the late humourist Sam Levenson for his granddaughter.

It is aptly written to encourage the inner beauty that can be developed by any women.

Would be great to have this read aloud by a female student or teacher as a warmer or enrichment activity when dealing with the theme of virtues, woman's role, the ideal women and beauty.

A discussion could also flow after reading the poem aloud. Topics such as physical beauty versus inner beauty, how to be a lady or character building.

Enjoy!


Rodney Tan Chai Whatt

--------------------------------------------------------------

Time Tested Beauty Tips

The following was written by the late educator-humorist Sam Levinson for his grandchild and read by Audrey Hepburn on Christmas Eve, 1992. It was also used by Ms. Hepburn on occasion when she was asked for beauty tips. [From Audrey Hepburn by Barry Paris, 1996, Putnam]

For attractive lips, speak words of kindness.

For lovely eyes, seek out the good in people.

For a slim figure, share your food with the hungry.

For beautiful hair, let a child run his or her fingers through it once a day.

For poise, walk with the knowledge that you never walk alone.

People, even more than things, have to be restored, renewed, revived, reclaimed and redeemed; never throw out anyone.

Remember, if you ever need a helping hand, you'll find one at the end of each of your arms.

As you grow older, you will discover that you have two hands, one for helping yourself, the other for helping others.

The beauty of a woman is not in the clothes she wears, the figure that she carries or the way she combs her hair.

The beauty of a woman must be seen from in her eyes, because that is the doorway to her heart, the place where love resides.

The beauty of a woman is not in a facial mode but the true beauty in a woman is reflected in her soul. It is the caring that she lovingly gives the passion that she shows. The beauty of a woman grows with the passing years.

Sam Levenson 

Contrary to what some may think, Audrey Hepburn did not write this beautiful poem, Sam Levenson did. Levenson wrote "Time Tested Beauty Tips" for his grandchild, and it just so happened to be one of Audrey's favorite poems. She read it to her children on the very last Christmas Eve she spent with us here on Earth.

File:Samlevenson.jpg

Thursday, June 7, 2012

Idea: Cartoon Strip - The Wheels of Life

Dear ETs,

From the moment we are born till our death, we seem to be transported on wheels.

The comic strip below is a humourous look at the various forms of transport that we get ourselves into at different ages of our life.

Some ideas I had was a discussion on various modes of transport, life and death, stages of a person's life and why do people choose different transportation at different stages of life.

Students can contruct sentences with structures such as "When I was _____ years old, I rode/drove (on) a _________ ." or "When I am _____ (age), I will ride/drive _____________ (transport)."

As a writing exercise, students can describe the various stages of life and what they are able to do.

This picture series can be cut up and students rearrange the pictures in the correct order. It will be a great warmer or enrichment activity.

What are some other ideas that we could do from this comic strip?

Comments and suggestions are welcomed.

Rodney Tan Chai Whatt

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Monday, June 4, 2012

News: Dancing for English

How about doing a flash mob dance as a way to learn English and advertise your English language association?

That's what happened at the UPSI teaching university in Tanjung Malim, Perak. Read all about this event below.

Rodney Tan
-----------------------------------

Dancing for English

STUDENTS and staff members of Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris in Tanjung Malim, Perak were given a surprise when a group of students from the English Language Association (ELA) performed a flash mob in front of the varsity’s Faculty of Languages and Communication.
The flash mob idea came about from several Teaching English as a Second Language (TESL) senior students and was agreed upon by the majority of the association members as a fun way of introducing the association into the varsity society.
“We wish to show students of other programmes that we, the English Language Association, are still active,” said association president Fitri Mokhtar.
ELA members staging a flash mob to introduce their association to other students.
To grab the attention of passers-by, one of the association members performed the Adele song Someone Like You.
As students gathered around the faculty’s entrance, a freeze mob that lasted two minutes was carried out by 24 association members.
The members, who were also TESL students, then rocked to the beat of LMFAO’s Party Rock Anthem before swaying their hips to Korean girl group Wonder Girls’ Nobody.
“Our intention of having this flash mob is not just to provide you with entertainment but to introduce and welcome you to our association,” explained the director of the programme Muhammad Hafizuddin Ahmad Shukri to the crowd.
When queried about their opinions on the performance, many who gathered to watch the dances agreed that it was a remarkable effort by the students to further establish the association in an interesting way.
The event was made even more memorable due to the participation of international students from Beijing, China.

Friday, February 17, 2012

Fun: English is Hilarious / Brilliant



































Tuesday, January 24, 2012

Happy Chinese Lunar New Year of the Dragon 2012

Dear All,

Here's another collection of pictures which was downloaded from my Facebook and from friends' referrals.

Enjoy!

Rodney Tan
------------------------------------------------



My children received this unique moveable action angpow (red packet with money). It's a Doraemon themed angpow where the two pictures will move when pulled. The circular Doraemon will turn clockwise while the smaller figure will move towards the right. The money will be in the envelope when you have pulled the right handle out. Cool!



This angpow was distributed by a Member of Parliament to promote her party and her constituency.

 


Chinese Character : loong meaning dragon


Chinese Lion Dance





Traditional Chinese New Year Meal


Old Style Hutong Chinese New Year Celebration





CNY Lanterns


Chinese Opera


Traditional Chinese Music - pipa


Traditional Lion Dance


Traditional Yee Sang dish (Cantonese)


CNY Lights at the Kek Lok Si Temple in Penang


CNY Lights in Penang

Monday, January 16, 2012

Views: Why Are SMart People Usually Ugly?


By Daniel Engber | Posted Tuesday, Jan. 10, 2012, at 6:52 PM ET
Slate.com
Why Are Smart People Usually Ugly?
An answer to the Explainer's 2011 Question of the Year.
Jean-Paul Sartre and Socrates were known for their brains and not their looks—at least not the good kind.
Illlustration by Charlie Powell.
It's been a few weeks since we posted the questions that the Explainer was either unwilling or unable to answer in 2011. Among this year's batch of imponderables were inquiries like, Are the blind sleepy all the time? and Does anyone ever get a sex change back? We asked our readers to pick the question that most deserved an answer in the Explainer column. Some 10,000 of you were able to register a vote, and the winning question is presented below. But first, the runners-up:
In third place, with 6.6 percent of the total votes, a bit of speculative evolutionary biology: Let's say that a meteor never hits the earth, and dinosaurs continue evolving over all the years human beings have grown into what we are today. What would they be like?
In second place, with 7.5 percent, an inquiry into pharmacokinetics: Why does it take 45 minutes for the pharmacy to get your prescription ready—even when no one else is waiting?
And in first place, with the support of 9.4 percent of our readers, the winner by a landslide and Explainer Question of the Year for 2011:
Why are smart people usually ugly? I get this isn't always the case, but there does seem to be a correlation. Attractiveness doesn't predict intelligence (not all ugly people are smart), but it seems like intelligence can be a good predictor for attractiveness (smart people are usually on the ugly side). Keep in mind, I have nothing against people who are really brilliant, I've just always wondered.
The answer: They’re not.
Oh, how the Explainer loves a false premise. When it comes time to assemble the year-end list, he'll always give extra credit to questions that are predicated on blatant untruths. In 2010, for example, someone wanted to know why athletes never sneeze. In 2009, a reader asked, Why is it always funny to put something on your head as a pretend hat? But this year's winning question isn't merely ill-posed; it gets the truth exactly backward.
The idea that an ugly face might hide a subtle mind has attracted scientific inquiries for many years. At first, scientists wanted to know whether it was possible to read someone's intelligence from the shape of his face. In 1918, a researcher in Ohio showed a dozen photographic portraits of well-dressed children to a group of physicians and teachers, and asked the adults to rank the kids from smartest to dumbest. A couple of years later, a Pittsburgh psychologist ran a similar experiment using headshots of 69 employees from a department store. In both studies, seemingly naive guesses were compared to actual test scores to see if they were ever accurate.*
Many such studies followed, and with consistent results: You can learn something about how smart someone is just by looking at a picture. But scientists couldn't figure out where that information might have been hiding in the photographs. The Ohio researcher said that some of his subjects were "greatly influenced by the pleasant appearance or smile, but for some the smile denotes intelligence and for others it denotes feeble-mindedness." The author of the follow-up in Pittsburgh wondered if the secret of intelligence might not be lurking in "the lustre of the eye."
While some researchers pondered this question, a Columbia University psychologist named Edward Thorndike made another, related discovery. In 1920, Thorndike published his theory of the "halo effect," according to which subjects, when asked to describe someone's various qualities, tend to "[suffuse] ratings of special features with a halo belonging to the individual as a whole." If they were describing the person's physique, for example, along with his bearing, intelligence, and tact, they would assign high or low ratings across the board. Later studies confirmed that the halo effect could arise from a simple photograph: If someone looks handsome, people tend to assume that he's smarter, more sociable, and better-adjusted, too.
Now there were two findings: First, scientists knew that it was possible to gauge someone's intelligence just by sizing him up; second, they knew that people tend to assume that beauty and brains go together. So they asked the next question: Could it be that good-looking people really are more intelligent?
Here the data were less clear, but several reviews of the literature have concluded that there is indeed a small, positive relationship between beauty and brains. Most recently, the evolutionary psychologist Satoshi Kanazawa pulled huge datasets from two sources—the National Child Development Study in the United Kingdom (including 17,000 people born in 1958), and the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health in the United States (including 21,000 people born around 1980)—both of which included ratings of physical attractiveness and scores on standard intelligence tests. When Kanazawa analyzed the numbers, he found the two were related: In the U.K., for example, attractive children have an additional 12.4 points of IQ, on average. The relationship held even when he controlled for family background, race, and body size.
From this, Kanazawa concluded that the famous halo effect is not a cognitive illusion, as so many academics had assumed, but rather an accurate reading of the world: We assume that beautiful people are smart, he argues, because they are.
The story does have some caveats and complications. First, a few other studies have come up with different results. A recent look at yearbook photos from a Wisconsin high school in 1957 found no link between IQ and attractiveness among the boys, but a positive correlation for the girls. Another researcher, Leslie Zebrowitz of Brandeis University, noticed that the looks-smarts relationship applies only to the ugly side of the spectrum. It's not that beautiful people are especially smart, she says, so much as that ugly people are especially dumb. Then there's the fact of Kanazawa's having gotten into trouble last spring for asserting—using the same dataset and similar methods to those described above—that African-American women are objectively "far less attractive" than whites, Asians, or Native Americans. (He later acknowledged some flaws in his analysis.)
So, getting back to the original question, the bulk of the evidence suggests that smart people are not "usually ugly." In fact, the opposite seems to be true: Either smart people are more beautiful than average, or dumb people are more ugly (or both). And while no facial features within the normal range could ever be that useful as a predictor of intelligence, people can perform better than you’d expect from random chance using nothing more than a head shot.
All of which leaves one great, unanswered question. If smart people tend to be good-looking, that might explain the halo effect. But what led our questioner to get things backward and assume that smart people were ugly? And why are there so many like-minded others, asking the same question—or its inverse—around the Internet? (Here's one, and one more.) Aren't we all familiar with the archetypical nerd, who is both ugly and smart? At the opposite end, what about all those beautiful, airheaded women and beefy, brainless men we see on television? Could the person who wrote in with the 2011 Question of the Year be succumbing to a bias that hasn't yet been documented in the lab—a sort of halo effect in reverse, a "horns effect," perhaps?
French philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre, 1957 STF/AFP/Getty Images.
Ugly geniuses aren't uncommon in history, of course, and while these anecdotes tell us nothing about the population as a whole, the memory of people who were famously hideous and brilliant might have an outsize influence on our judgments. Jean-Paul Sartre, for example, was short, bespectacled, and wall-eyed. ("I cannot even decide whether [my face] is handsome or ugly," says one of his characters in Nausea. "I think it is ugly because I have been told so.") Ancient sources tell us that the great philosopher Socrates had thinning hair, flared nostrils, widely-spaced eyes, a thick neck, slobby shoulders, and a pot belly. Ludwig van Beethoven was ugly and smelled bad; Abraham Lincoln's face struck the poet Walt Whitman as being "so awful ugly it becomes beautiful."
In addition, Kanazawa points out that a closer look at the data reveals an interesting fact: The very ugliest people in his dataset are dumber on average, but they also tend to be the most diverse when it comes to intelligence. That means that if you're at the low end of the spectrum for looks, you're more likely than anyone else to be at one extreme end for IQ (either very dumb or very smart). If that's the case, then it might provide another reason why Sartre and Socrates types stick out in our minds. We know (consciously or not) that ugly people tend to be a little dim; but at the same time, there are more brilliant brutes running around than we might expect.
For his part, Kanazawa rejects the notion of the horns effect—he doesn't believe the smart-and-ugly stereotype exists at all. (Indeed, it has never been shown in the lab.) Instead, he says, we may be assuming that smart people are nerdy, and that nerdy people tend to lack social skills. Since people with social skills are attractive, there could be an indirect link between at least one kind of "attractiveness" and intelligence. But if you're looking at pure "beauty," as measured by rating photographs or measured facial features, then intelligence and looks go hand-in-hand.
Bonus Explainer: Why might intelligence and looks go hand-in-hand? There are a few different theories. First, it might be that some common genetic factor produces both smarts and beauty. Or maybe there's a combination of genes that make people both dumb and ugly. Kanazawa thinks it's the former, arguing that intelligent men have tended to rise to the top of the social hierarchy and select beautiful women as their mates. Their offspring, contra George Bernard Shaw's supposed quip, would have had both traits together.
Another theory holds that certain environmental factors in the womb or just after birth can produce both facial disfigurements and cognitive impairments on one side, or facial symmetry and high intelligence on the other. A third suggests that attractive children are treated better, and receive more attention from their caretakers and teachers, which helps to nurture a sharper mind. It's also possible that smart people are better able to take care of themselves and their looks.
Explainer thanks Satoshi Kanazawa of the London School of Economics, Joshua Knobe of Yale University, Alina Simone, author of You Must Go and Win, and Leslie Zebrowitz of Brandeis University.
* * *
Good news: After years of hiding out in the Explainatorium like a banished superhero, answering submitted questions from deep inside the fortress, the Explainer has decided to soar out into the world, pen in hand, to spread peace and understanding among the column's faithful.
And so we present a new, occasional feature on Slate: the Explainer House Call. Do you have a family disagreement over some fact or pseudo-fact? Are you stuck in an endless argument with an annoying co-worker or a friend? Have your attempts to Google your way out of it only pushed you both into the filter bubbles of the Internet? Worry no more: The Explainer will be your arbiter and your savior, an avenging angel of argument, slinging thunderbolts of pure reason and drenching your squabbles in the heavy rain of explanation.
How does one qualify for this personal Explainer service? To get a house call, and have the Explainer resolve your special beef in Slate, you must first gain the support of your peers. What factual matter has been driving you and your friend/spouse/coworker bonkers in recent weeks? Post a short summary on or with the hashtag #ExplainerHouseCall. Then we'll ask the members of Explainer Nation to vote for the dispute that's most deserving of the Explainer's attention.      (Winners: Please note that the Explainer will not actually visit your house.)

Correction, Jan. 12, 2012: The original overstated the magnitude of the results of the Ohio and Pittsburgh studies.

Saturday, December 3, 2011

Video: Words As Image

Dear All,

The video below is just a brilliant representation of a creative concept.

Its main premise is words can be treated as images.

A book by the same title is out in the market.

Enjoy!


Rodney Tan Chai Whatt

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Sunday, November 13, 2011

Inspirational Teacher: The Ron Clark Story

Dear All,

Ron Clark is an unusual teacher with a passion and a mission to educate his students to love studying and to excel in their academic achievements.

This award-winning educator had been invited to the White House and appeared on the Oprah Winfrey Show.

His achievements were recognised and he was awarded the Walt Disney Teacher of the Year.

He has travelled to schools and 49 districts in the USA, and also internationally.

An inspiring movie entitled "The Ron Clark Story" was made about him and it can be viewed in parts on YouTube.

He has written 2 New York Times bestseller entitled : "The Essential 55" and "The Excellent 11: tips about how to motivate, inspire and educate children".

Ron Clark had set up the Ron Clark Academy in Atlanta, Georgia in the USA. This school was primarily for fee paying student but most of them are actually on scholarship. But the main aim this special school was set up was to teach teachers his unorthodox methods that seems to be paying dividends in terms of the students love for learning and their above average academic and co-curricular achievements.

Below is the video from the CNN about this extraordinary teacher, his unusual methods and the school he had built in Atlanta.

Be inspired teachers as I have!

Rodney Tan
--------------------------------------

Tuesday, October 4, 2011

Vocabulary: Understanding Business Jargon

Dear Readers,

Below this note is an article from the Daily Mail, UK which would be useful for those who teach business English and for others who are curious to know the latest business jargon, idioms, catch phrase, acronymns and initialisms used in the office context.

For general readers, reading this article will help us gain useful knowledge and make us smile as some of the explanations about the jargons are really funny and bizarre.

The main source of these office phrases is from a recently published book: Pushing The Envelope: Making Sense Out Of Business Jargon by Caroline Taggart (Michael O’Mara Books, £9.99).

Enjoy!

Rodney Tan
----------------------------------------

Tuesday, Oct 04 2011 t

OK you cubicle monkeys, guess who's gonna be delayered in the blamestorm! Baffled by bizarre office jargon? Let us translate for you


Sick of bosses and work colleagues spouting incomprehensible metaphors, acronyms and made-up words? If so, fear not - this handy guide to office speak explains all...

Gobbledegook: David Brent could use many of the phrases outlined in a new book on office jargon

SITTING DOWN
When a perfectly sensible phrase already exists, why invent a daft one to replace it? ‘Shall we sit down on this?’ translates as ‘Shall we have a meeting?’

CUBICLE MONKEY
A derogatory expression for someone performing a never-ending stream of dull and repetitive tasks in the confines of a 5ft-x-5ft fibreboard cell.

MARZIPAN LAYER
Stickier version of the glass ceiling. Barrier between middle-management and the boardroom above which few women rise.

BRAIN DUMP
You’re leaving your job — and the 30,000 emails, 400 Word documents and 150 Powerpoint presentations you accrued while there. You want to make this information available to your successor but don’t want the bother of sorting through the rubbish.

The solution? Save it all on to the computer system and ‘dump’ it on the poor chap who inherits your computer. Frankly, you’re beyond caring.

MANAGING EXPECTATIONS
Also known as brazen deception — like telling your shareholders to expect the worst, then dazzling them with better-than-expected profits. The great proponent of this is the Disneyland theme park, which hangs a sign saying ‘Waiting time for ride from here 45 minutes’ at the point in the queue when the waiting time is, in fact, 30 minutes.

Punters are then delighted to reach the front of the queue 15 minutes earlier than expected.

WATER-COOLER MOMENT
This phrase first came into use in the 1990s to describe a controversial moment in a soap opera that had everyone talking around the watercooler/fax machine the following morning.

A chat about last night's television coined the phrase water-cooler moment

Example: ‘Did you see Nancy on Strictly last night? Talk about hoisted by her own feather boa.’

BLUE-SKY THINKING
In the 1960s and 70s, blue-sky thinking was something to be avoided. It meant an unrealistic, unaffordable pipe dream. But the phrase has had a make-over and is now something to aspire to, meaning: ‘The sky’s the limit — so reach for the stars!’

THOUGHT SHOWER
Invented by the PC brigade in 2004, after civil servants deemed brainstorm offensive to people with brain disorders such as epilepsy. The National Society For Epilepsy then carried out a survey that reported ‘93 per cent of people with epilepsy did not find the term derogatory or offensive in any way’. A small victory for common sense.

PUSHING THE ENVELOPE
In aeronautical parlance, the ‘flight envelope’ describes a plane’s best possible performance — flying at the fastest speed, the highest altitude, using full engine capacity. Engineers and test pilots who ‘pushed the envelope’ were trying to create a plane that could fly faster, higher and farther than ever before.

Now it refers to any moderately ambitious office project, leading to the joke: ‘No matter how much you push the envelope, it will still be stationary.’

JOINED-UP
A phrase much-loved by New Labour, which touted its ‘joined-up government’ of supposedly integrated social policies. It has since spilled over into office life, with firms bragging about their ‘joined-up thinking’. Which is invariably nothing of the sort.

SWARM INTELLIGENCE

The metaphor of swarm intelligence comes from the notion of hives of bees or colonies of ants working together to a common end. So team work

CORE COMPETENCIES
Otherwise known as: ‘What you’re good at.’

BLAMESTORMING
A corruption of ‘brainstorming’, blamestorming is a meeting or discussion held to establish who is at fault when something has gone wrong.

Everyone concerned gathers to excuse themselves and pass the blame on to the nearest scapegoat — like on The Apprentice.

MUSHROOM MANAGEMENT
An aggressive style of management. Jonathan Green, who compiled a Dictionary of Jargon in 1987, defines it as a theory of management that believes the best way of treating employees is to ‘put them in the dark, feed them muck and watch them grow’. Time off and pension packages do not feature heavily.

SALAMI TACTICS
Refers to a type of computer fraud which transfers small — salami-thin — amounts of money, never enough to be noticeable, from one account to another.

MASS SAMPLING
If you’ve ever accepted a free cube of cheese in a supermarket or been accosted by a perfume spritzer in a department store, then you’ve been a victim of mass sampling. A marketing ploy intended to make customers try — then buy — a new product. Also known as a freebie.

SWOT ANALYSIS
A U.S. management term from the Sixties, SWOT stands for ‘strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats’.

Discussion: Employees get together in a SWOT analysis to talk about the business and its competitors - which the boss then often ignores

Employees get together to consider the business, its competitors and the state of the market. Then the boss ignores them.

FUD
An acronym for fear, uncertainty and doubt — a set of negative emotions planted in the minds of the public by those involved in politics and marketing. The aim of a FUD strategy is to scare voters or customers away from voting for an unproven party, or buying a rival new product.

ZERO-SUM GAME
An outcome in which one side’s gain precisely matches another side’s loss. The phrase originated in a branch of mathematics known as Game Theory. It’s what happens when that greedy swine from accounts snaffles the last slice of cake just before you in the canteen.

DELAYERING
A way of making an organisation less bureaucratic. Also a euphemism for ‘redundancies’.

(OUT OF) LEFT FIELD
An American baseball term that has crossed the Atlantic. A ball bowled out of left field is one the batsman isn’t expecting. A left-field idea comes out of nowhere, doesn’t follow logically from anything that has been discussed before — and may well be complete rubbish.

WOMBAT
‘Waste of money, brains and time.’ Swiftly followed by the sack.

DEAD CAT BOUNCE
An expression born in the trading rooms of Singapore and Malaysia and adopted by Wall Street in the mid-1980s. Working on the assumption that ‘even a dead cat would bounce if it was dropped from a great height’, the phrase is used to describe a brief upturn in the value of a stock after it’s hit rock bottom.

UPSTREAM/ DOWNSTREAM
Traditionally used by anglers and canoeists, the terms refer to various stages in the manufacturing process. Upstream refers to the manufacturer, downstream to the retailer. And somewhere at the furthest end of the stream, basking in the shallows, is the customer.

  • Pushing The Envelope: Making Sense Out Of Business Jargon by Caroline Taggart (Michael O’Mara Books, £9.99).

Comments (10)

Some of my (least) favourite: "Moving forwards" (doing it), "being proactive" (having another meeting), "dynamic" (anything but), and "forward thinking" (realising the project you are half way through completing probably needs a reason for existing)

- James, Luton, 04/10/2011 11:50

My current hate phrase - "over arching"....GAH!

- norfolksheep, Norfolk UK, 04/10/2011 11:08

"Top slicing" is another currently fashionable piece of stupid jargon. I have long been wary of people that use jargon, concluding that they usually have no idea what they are talking about. Sadly local authorities are very susceptable to using meaningless jargon. It's often in their staff job descriptions!

- Peter Phillips, Surrey, 04/10/2011 10:45

My very large company has loads. 'moving forward' means we are going to do what the manager says even if it is daft and if you keep argueing against it you are holding up progress. 'meet the future demands of the megatrends' means we have no idea what the future of the business will be. 'Synergies' we have shoved together two functions that don't work together, did it anyway. 'our vision' - your vision, I will have my own visions thank you very much. blah blah..

- The Monitor, Revelation, 04/10/2011 10:20

Guy at my work says "I've no spare bandwidth" meaning he's busy!!! Don't know how I keep a straght face.

- Mboza Ritchie, Just up the road, 04/10/2011 10:05

As far as I can remember, Ricky Gervais never used phrases like these in The Office. - Mike, Thailand, 04/10/2011 04:57 Ricky Gervais did use management speak in The Office. In series 2, he kept Neil up to date with a management style called 'Team Individuality'

- The bitter truth is hard to swallow, Birmingham, UK, 04/10/2011 09:31